Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1941No. 6 Div. 859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The petition for certiorari is by the State to review and revise the decision of the Court of Appeals. It is averred in the petition that “The Court of Appeals erred in reversing said cause in the following ways, towit: 1. In reversing and remanding the judgment of the lower court. 2. In holding that Count 29 of the indictment was defective in that the crimes attempted to be charged were by disjunctive averments in the alternative, one of which included acts not prohibited by the statute in question.”

Count 29, in question, is in the following language: “The Grand Jury of said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. McCoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  2. Lucas v. OliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Raisler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Lyman v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lever Brothers Company v. ErbeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Ingram v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API