Ingram v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
It appears from the record, that this appellant was tried jointly with one W. S. Brewer, upon an indictment against each of them, wherein they were charged with the offenses of petit larceny, embezzlement, and extortion. Each offense as charged was a misdemeanor.
The indictment upon which appellant was tried was unusual in that a misdemeanor only was charged, as stated, yet it contained 29 separate counts, and, as transcribed in the record, consumed more than eight pages of the transcript. While, as-stated, such an indictment in a charge of one misdemeanor is unusual,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Doss v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Horton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Raisler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Ex Parte StollenwerckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- State v. NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Brewer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941