Legal Opinion

Todd v. Bivins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 9, 1959No. 20648, 20649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

1. “A petition for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, is sufficient as against general demurrer, where it is alleged that the contract is in writing, signed by both of the parties, is certain and fair, and is for an adequate consideration and capable of being performed. Code § 37-801; Clark v. Cagle, 141 Ga. 703 (81 S. E. 21, L. R. A. 1915A, 317); Irvin v. Locke, 200 Ga. 675, 676 (38 S. E. 2d 289).” Scheer v. Doss, 211 Ga. 7, 8 (83 S. E. 2d 612). In this case it is alleged that the contract sought to be specifically performed is in writing, signed by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blaisdell v. BohrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  2. Clark v. CagleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Irvin v. LockeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. McCall v. FrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Finney v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Firstline Corp. v. Valdosta-Lowndes County Industrial AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. DeLoacheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API