Legal Opinion

Bache & Co., Inc. v. William J. Taylor, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1972No. 71-2533PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, BACHE & CO., instituted this action in June of 1970 in a federal district court in Miami, Florida, against defendants, William J. Taylor, Jr., C. Sue Burnstein, and Kenneth Burn-stein, seeking recovery upon a promissory note and compensatory and punitive damages for common law fraud and for alleged violations of federal and state securities fraud statutes. Pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the district court entered default judgments against all of the defendants because of their willful disobedience of the district court’s orders. Judgment was entered in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benada Aluminum Products Company v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Crow, Pope and Land Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Windbourne v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  3. Vann v. Citicorp Savings Of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Vann v. Citicorp Savings ex rel. Glen Ellyn Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API