Legal Opinion

Neal v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 1930No. [No. 50, April Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

George W. Ware died intestate, leaving surviving him five nieces and a nephew as his sole distributees and next of kin. His estate consisted of leasehold property and other personalty, which his niece and administratrix converted, and,, after discharging all debts and the charges incident to the-administration, there remained for distribution between $14,000 and $15,000. The nephew and nieces asserted that they were entitled as the next of kin to- be distributed the whole of this residue, while Laura -C. Hamilton claimed that the entire fund was distributable to her by force of a subsisting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Hamilton v. ThirstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  3. Mundorff v. KilbournCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  4. Whitridge v. ParkhurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  5. Scott v. MardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  2. Mannix v. BaumgardnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Evans v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Ledingham v. BaylessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Unitas v. TempleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API