Legal Opinion

Unitas v. Temple

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 9, 1989No. 47, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The late Raymond V. Rangle, M.D. (Rangle) died intestate in June 1983 at age sixty-seven. After his death his long time fiancee and lover, Janet Marsha Temple (Temple), the respondent, brought this action to enforce an alleged oral contract under which Rangle was to provide for Temple in his will. Although Rangle’s estate included realty, the circuit court held that the statute of frauds was inapplicable because of part performance by Temple. The Court of Special Appeals agreed. Unitas v. Temple, 74 Md. App. 506, 538 A.2d 1201 (1988) (Wenner, J., dissenting). Because the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Phillips v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Hamilton v. ThirstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. FickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Heritage Oldsmobile-Imports v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  5. Snyder v. SnyderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API