Legal Opinion

People v. Lara

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 2009No. 05CA2281PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RUSSELL.

Appellate courts often say that jury instructions should "track the language" of the governing statute. See, e.g., People v. Weinreich, 119 P.3d 1073, 1076 (Colo.2005). But this statement, like many legal maxims, is true only up to a point. Sometimes, it is wrong to use statutory language in jury instructions. See, e.g., Leonard v. People, 149 Colo. 360, 374, 369 P.2d 54, 62 (1962).

Here, the court gave a jury instruction that tracked the language of section 18-1-7O4(4), C.R.S.2008. Because this language violated the defendant's right to due process, we reverse his…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. People v. SpotoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Griego v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. PickeringSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. People v. MendenhallColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Montoya v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. People v. DuranColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. ZukowskiColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API