Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2012No. WD 74126PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Marvin Hendrix (“Hendrix”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment overruling his Rule 29.15 motion. Hendrix claims that the trial court clearly erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Hendrix contends that trial counsel failed to investigate and present evidence of his medical history in support of his self-defense claim and that trial counsel failed to request lesser-included jury instructions for assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Viewed in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Ransom v. Adams Dairy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McNeal v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Prince v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Taqwa Thompson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Williamson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API