Legal Opinion

Williamson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 2013No. ED 98759PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

D’Marcus Williamson (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

A jury convicted Movant of one count of first-degree robbery. The trial court sentenced Movant to 12 years in prison. This court affirmed the judgment and sentence in a per curiam order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). State v. Williamson, 349 S.W.3d 473 (Mo.App.2011). Movant then sought post-conviction relief claiming, as pertinent here, that his trial counsel was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. Sidebottom v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Demarco McCrady, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Hudson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Brandon Eugene Fisher v. Bill StangeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026
  5. Darian Cummings v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API