Legal Opinion

Housh v. Peth

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1955No. 2320PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiseman, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, Ohio, entered in favor of plaintiff, in an action for damages for the invasion of plaintiff’s “right of privacy.” The cause was tried to a jury which rendered a verdict against the defendant Mark A. Peth in the sum of $3,000. Motion for judgment non obstante veredicto was overruled. In entering judgment on the verdict, the trial court granted a remittitur in the amount of $1,000 and entered judgment for $2,000.

Because of the unusual nature of this litigation and the novel legal question…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Brents v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Barnett v. Collection Service Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Brenda Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc., a Corporation, and Ray Smalley, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API