Bugg v. Perry & Faircloth
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Although in the brief filed for the plaintiff in error.there.is reference to the fact that exceptions. were taken to the judgment overruling the demurrer to the petition, these exceptions have not been *524argued in the brief or otherwise; nor has the defendant made any general or other insistence thereon. These exceptions therefore are' treated as abandoned, and will not be considered. Cooper v. Bowen, 140 Ga. 45 (5) (78 S. E. 413) ; Condon v. Dehart, 143 Ga. 185 (2) (84 S. E. 540).
2. In section 2712 of the Civil Code (1910) it-is declared that a common carrier of goods is bound to use…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooper v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. White & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Cash v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Atlanta and West Point Railroad v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Johnson & Shahan v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Tifton Produce Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Loo-Mac Freight Lines, Inc. v. American Type Founders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FugazziCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932