Legal Opinion

Wade v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1989No. Appeal No. 1933 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Michael Wade appeals an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review that affirmed a referee’s decision denying him benefits pursuant to section 402(e) of the Law, the willful misconduct disqualification.1

Ellisco, Inc. employed Mr. Wade as a production worker from August 1978 until his discharge on October 2, 1987, for excessive unexcused absences. Effective January 1, 1987, Ellisco implemented an absenteeism policy *77that set forth procedures to be followed for unexcused and excused absences that stated:

Excused Absences are those absences approved by Management…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Adept Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Brady v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Lacomis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Moore v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. C. Ng v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API