Legal Opinion

Ingold v. Ingold

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 26, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

The motion of the defendant is- denied.

This action, which involves a considerable sum of money, was discontinued after issue joined, by the plaintiff and defendant entering into a stipulation, in and by which' they consented to the dismissal of the action. The action is based upon contract; the stipulation was made and entered into and signed by the plaintiff without the knowledge or consent of her attorney, and made and entered into by the defendant with knowledge, either actual or constructive, that the plaintiff’s attorney had an interest in the lawsuit by way of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Poole v. . BelchaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Crowley v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. In Re BadgerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Transocean Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Transocean Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Paolillo v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Katopodis v. Liberian S/T Olympic SunDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
  5. Application of David Kamerman, as Attorney and Counselor at Law of the State of New York, for an Adjudication of Said Attorney's Rights in the Action of Jbp Holding Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, Against United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API