Legal Opinion

Chickanosky v. Chickanosky

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 11, 2012No. 11-305PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. The present appeal is the third in as many years involving the same parties. Mother appeals a family court order modifying her parent-child contact rights. We affirm.

¶ 2. The parties originally agreed to share parental rights and responsibilities as part of a December 2005 divorce order. In 2009, the family court granted, in part, father’s motion to modify the original divorce order by awarding him sole legal parental rights and responsibilities. We affirmed in a three-justice entry order. See Chickanosky v. Chickanosky, Nos. 2009-094 & 2009-444, 2010 WL 7799902 (Vt. May 21, 2010)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleverly v. CleverlySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. P.F. Jurgs & Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. DeSantis v. PeguesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Chickanosky v. ChickanoskySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Paine v. BuffaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Patnode v. UretteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Jill Rinehart, M.D. v. Eric SvenssonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API