Legal Opinion

Stallings v. Ratliff

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 4, 1987No. 0950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

Naomi Stallings brought this action for injuries she allegedly received as a result of the negligence of her physician, Dr. Jack Ratliff. The companion case involving a loss of consortium claim by her husband was consolidated for trial. Stallings alleges she suffered a perforation of her esophagus during an esophagoscopy undertaken without her informed consent. At the close of the evidence, the circuit court granted Ratliffs motion for a directed verdict. Stallings and her husband appeal. We reverse and remand.

Stallings works as a cook at a restaurant in Aiken. One day, while…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. Children's Clinic, P. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. O'Neal v. Carolina Farm Supply of Johnston, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Staudinger v. Sooner Pipe & Supply CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. Mid-Carolina Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Hickman v. Sexton ClinicCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Fletcher v. Medical UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Sims v. HallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. McBeth v. TNS Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API