Railway Co. v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
EROM SHELBY. Appeal iii error from Criminal Court of Shelby County. May Term, 1888. J. J. DuBose, J.
1Opinion of the Court
J. M. Dickinson, Sp. J.
The defendant railway company and Wm. Katzenberger were indicted for *747creating and maintaining a nuisance in McLemore Avenue, Shelby County, and it is charged that such nuisance was consequent upon the unlawful location and improper maintenance of a railway on said avenue. ¥m. Katzenberger was receiver of the defendant company, and the condition complained of in the indictment existed at the time of his appointment and continued during his management up to the time of indictment.
It appears from the evidence, that the part of the avenue occupied by the track of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eyler v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Burritt v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Reading v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- City of Chattanooga v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Highland Park v. Dallas Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Yarbrough v. L. N.R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.