Legal Opinion

Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School Authority

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 1983No. 2727PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc., appellee, brought an action in assumpsit against the Nether Providence Township School Authority, appellant, seeking compensation for extra work required for site development in the construction of a high school. Appellant joined as additional defendants H. Gilroy Damon and H. Gilroy Damon Associates, Inc., (Damon), the engineering firm which had surveyed the site. Damon, in turn, joined Haag and D’Entremont, (Haag), the architectural firm that originally prepared the job site plans, as an additional defendant. A jury trial was held in May, 1979,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Ragan v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Wagner v. Graziano Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Emporium Area Joint School Authority v. Anundson Construction & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Moyer v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlas Tack Corp. v. DonabedMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Nether Providence Township School Authority v. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Nether Providence Township School Authority v. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API