Hixon v. Buchberger
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
After the trial court held that his complaint failed to state a claim, the petitioner asked us to recognize as part of Maryland common law a cause of action for money damages based on intentional interference by a nonparental, noncustodial third party with the child visitation rights of a noncustodial parent. The intentional interference alleged here is primarily belligerent and hostile statements made to the petitioner, Jonathan D. Hixon (Hixon). We agree that his complaint does not state a damage claim. Our explanation follows.
Hixon’s visitation rights were judicially…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Kenneth G. Lloyd v. Irma Loeffler and Alvin F. LoefflerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Thomas A. Bennett v. Patricia A. BennettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- William Franz v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carter v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Bobo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Fairbanks v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.