State v. Bolden
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
639 So.2d 721 (1994)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Ivrin BOLDEN, Jr.
No. 93-KK-1933.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
July 5, 1994.
A.M. Stroud, III, Blanchard, Walker, O'Quin & Roberts, Shreveport, M. Allyn Stroud, Brook, Morial, Cassibry, Pizza & Adcock, New Orleans, for applicant.
Richard Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., Jerry J. Jones, Dist. Atty., Charles Leslie Cook, Asst. Dist. Atty., for respondent.
MARCUS, Justice[*].
At issue is whether a defendant acquitted of a crime may be subsequently tried for perjury based on a later statement made by him contradicting his testimony at the former trial.
On March 20, 1987,…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- State v. WarnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Ivrin Bolden, Jr. v. Warden, West Tennessee High Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.