Martin v. Martin & Bowne Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal from a decision of tbe Commissioner of Patents granting a motion to quash an opposition to the registration of a trademark. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shepard
This appeal has been prosecuted by William L. Martin from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents quashing his opposition to the registration of a trademark applied for by Martin & Bowne Company.
On April 7,1905, Martin & Bowne Company filed an application for the registration of the word “Marguerite,” a trademark for tooth brushes.
This application conformed to the requirements of the trademark act approved February 20, 1905, and the required notice thereof was given.
*61Within the time limited by the law, an opposition thereto was filed by William L. Martin, through his attorney, Joseph L.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewin v. DilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
- In re Chequasset Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1901
- Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. LawsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Bruff, Faulkner & Co. v. Stern & Bro.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Huthsing v. MausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Englander v. Continental Distilling Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938