Legal Opinion
FCC v. Mizuho Medy Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 15, 2009No. Civil No. 07cv189 MMA (NLS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) GRANTING SSL AMERICA’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF FCC AND FOR SANCTIONS [Doc. No. 163]; and(2) DENYING FCC’S CROSS MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS [Doc. Nos. 174, 176].
NITA L. STORMES, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant SSL Americas, Inc. (SSL) filed a motion to compel the deposition of Jay Atkins, the corporate designee of plaintiff FCC (FCC). SSL also seeks monetary sanctions to cover the costs and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in trying to compel this deposition. FCC filed a cross-motion for a protective order to either limit the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Detoy v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- King v. Pratt & WhitneyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
- Paparelli v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Smith v. Logansport Community School Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Foundation for Independent Living Centers v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- C.R. v. Elk Grove Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Lake v. City of VallejoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Muthana v. OnyangoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Shreves v. Frontier Rail CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.