Legal Opinion
Duckworth v. MID-STATE MACHINE PRODUCTS
District Court, D. Maine
Decided September 3, 2010No. CV-09-279-B-WPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief District Judge.
Concluding that Glenn Duckworth has generated genuine issues of material fact that prevent summary judgment in favor of Mid-State Machine Products (Mid-State), the Court denies Mid-State’s dis-positive motions in this Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA) case.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Procedural History
On June 26, 2009, Glenn Duckworth filed a complaint in this Court asserting that his former employer Mid-State violated the ADEA and the MHRA by refusing to hire him and by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hall v. Mid-State Machine ProductsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012