Cub Cadet Corp. v. Rosage (In Re Rosage)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERNARD MARKOYITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtors maintain that the complaint against them in the above adversary action is untimely and that its filing is not supported by existing law. They seek dismissal of the complaint because it is untimely and imposition of sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011.
Plaintiff Cub Cadet Corporation, Inc. (hereinafter “Cub”) insists that the complaint was timely and denies that Rule 9011 was violated.
Debtor’s motion will be granted. The complaint will be dismissed because it is untimely. Also, because Rule 9011 was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- In Re William M. ALTON, Debtor, Bronson F. BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William A. ALTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Stanley L. Neeley v. Clinton W. Murchison, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meis-Nachtrab v. Griffin (In Re Meis-Nachtrab)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- Kahl v. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (In Re Kahl)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Taylor v. Slick (In Re Taylor)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- California Coast University v. Aleckna (In re Aleckna)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re RowlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.