Legal Opinion

Parchen v. Anderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Second District, Silver Bow County.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

This is an action on an account for goods, wares and merchandise alleged to have been sold by plaintiffs to the defendants, as partners, during the year 1881. There was a verdict and judgment for defendant Nickel, and a motion for new trial overruled, from the order overruling which, and from the judgment, the plaintiffs appeal.

The action is against Frederick C. Anderson, Rudolph Schoulder and Henry Nickel, who are charged as partners; and the question to be determined is whether, under the facts and the law, the defendant Nickel was a partner with the defendants Anderson and Schoulder, and,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Loomis v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  3. Thompson v. First Nat. Bank of ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Green v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
  5. Berthold v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Croft v. BainMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Weiss v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Bischoff v. BischoffMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Sanborn Co. v. PowersMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Kinney v. Bank of PlymouthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API