Legal Opinion
Usefof v. Herzenstein
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 15, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by the defendant Herzenstein from a judgment of the Oity Court of the city of Mew York, entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.
The defendant Morris Herzenstein made the following note:
“1000. Mew Yobk. ........., 190
“..............after date..............promise to pay to the order of...........................One thousand dollars at 108 Grand Street, Mew York.
“ Value received. M. Hebzeesteik.”
The entire note was in print, except the words “ One thousand dollars ” and “ 108 Grand Street, Mew York,” and the *46signature “ M. Herzenstein.” In this form it was endorsed by the defendant David Herzenstein and then delivered to plaintiff for value, on December 27, 1904, and said Morris Herzenstein, in the presence of David…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of United States v. MoskowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Keister v. WadeNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Coward v. SatuloffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Usefof v. HerzensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910