Legal Opinion
Castillo v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 29, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01017Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTURO MARCELINO CASTILLO, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1017-BTM-DEB BOOKING #92864-298, 12 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff, 13 MOTION TO DISMISS vs. COMPLAINT 14 15 [ECF NO. 10] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is Defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss 21 Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff, who is incarcerated and proceeding pro se, 22 filed an Opposition. (ECF No. 21.) The Defendant filed a Reply. (ECF No. 22.) For the 23 reasons discussed below, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.