Legal Opinion

Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. Frascatore (In Re Frascatore)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1983No. 19-10727PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issue presented herein is whether the mortgagee is entitled to modification of the automatic stay provisions of section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) to permit it to proceed with foreclosure proceedings so that the debtors’ residence may be sold at sheriff’s sale. Because the debtors have made but two payments to the mortgagee since the filing of their petition almost eleven months ago, we conclude that ample “cause” exists to justify the modification of the automatic stay.

The facts of the instant case are basically undisputed: 1 On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth School Employees' Retirement Fund v. Heath (Heath)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Miners National Bank of Pottsville v. Schramm (In Re Schramm)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re TashjianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Frascatore v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Frascatore)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. In Re ShariyfDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. In Re Morysville Body Works, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In Re KeulUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API