Legal Opinion

Midland Insurance v. Yanke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1983No. 13282PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On or about July 13, 1979, Yanke Plumbing and Heating Co. (Yanke) entered into a series of five separate written contracts with a general contractor named Bernard Schiappa, who was doing business with Joseph Ash as Contemporary Builders. Contemporary Builders has never been licensed with the State Contractor’s Board (Board). Pursuant to those contracts, Yanke furnished all materials and labor necessary to complete the “rough,” “top-out” and “finished” plumbing for six houses in Clark County, Nevada. Yanke contends that Schiappa owes approximately $6,000 under the July 13th contracts…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,798 Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Commodity Exchange, Inc., Howard D. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. Cheqer, Inc. v. Painters & Decorators Joint Committee, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Schlytter v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Zuni Construction Co. v. Great American InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Western Surety Company v. HorrallArizona Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Servaites v. LowdenNevada Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API