Legal Opinion
Doe v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1980No. 78-3065PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
Appellee brought this action for injunctive relief on behalf of her minor son, John Doe, alleging that appellants had infringed his rights under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794.1 The minor, *119who has remained anonymous throughout these proceedings, is an emotionally handicapped individual who transferred from one school district to another for medical reasons. Appellant University Interscholastic League (UIL) interpreted its own transfer regulations to preclude John from playing football at his new school. The district court found that all four…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrow v. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Catherine Walsh, Etc. v. Louisiana High School Athletic Association, Lutheran High School Association of Greater New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Janvey v. AlguireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- American Can Company v. Ishwar Mansukhani, D/B/A Brand Associates, and Ruth Brand, D/B/A Brand Associates, and Brand M, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Dorothy Frazier v. The Board of Trustees of Northwest Mississippi Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Monzillo v. BillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Curtis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.