Legal Opinion

Hartsfield Co. v. Ray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1935No. 24363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. Where the plaintiff obtains a judgment against the maker of a note and his accommodation indorsers, and sues out process of garnishment thereon, directed to the employer of the defendants, and thereafter judgment is entered against the garnishee, and execution issues thereon, and the garnishee, after threats of levy, pays into court certain sums due the defendants as wages, which were impounded by *107the garnishment proceedings, and the plaintiff receives from the court such sums so paid by the garnishee into court; and where a motion for a new trial is made and overruled in the main action,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. HurstSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Realty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Dent v. DentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Doody Co. v. JeffcoatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Chicago Herald Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Fender v. HendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Zurich Insurance Company v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API