Legal Opinion

Zurich Insurance Company v. Bonebrake

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 27, 1958No. 18132PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

On March 14, 1956, Velma M. Bonebrake obtained a judgment in the sum of $32,500.00 against E. M. Davis and George K. Niehouse in the District Court of Denver. Davis and Niehouse sued out a writ of error. On their application for supersedeas the same was granted conditioned on the filing of a good and sufficient bond in the sum of $35,000.00 within 15 days of June 28, 1956.

Davis and Niehouse having failed to comply with the order of this court respecting the filing of a bond in supersedeas, Mrs. Bonebrake instituted garnishment proceedings against Zurich Insurance Company, formerly Zurich…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. First National Bank v. Hahnemann Institutions of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. City & County of Denver v. WillsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Madero v. CalzadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Chicago Herald Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fortune v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Muck v. Arapahoe County District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Western Medical Properties Corp. v. Denver Opportunity, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1980
  4. Pennington v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. McQuade v. McQuadeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API