Zurich Insurance Company v. Bonebrake
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz
On March 14, 1956, Velma M. Bonebrake obtained a judgment in the sum of $32,500.00 against E. M. Davis and George K. Niehouse in the District Court of Denver. Davis and Niehouse sued out a writ of error. On their application for supersedeas the same was granted conditioned on the filing of a good and sufficient bond in the sum of $35,000.00 within 15 days of June 28, 1956.
Davis and Niehouse having failed to comply with the order of this court respecting the filing of a bond in supersedeas, Mrs. Bonebrake instituted garnishment proceedings against Zurich Insurance Company, formerly Zurich…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- First National Bank v. Hahnemann Institutions of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- City & County of Denver v. WillsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Madero v. CalzadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Chicago Herald Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fortune v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
- Muck v. Arapahoe County District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Western Medical Properties Corp. v. Denver Opportunity, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1980
- Pennington v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- McQuade v. McQuadeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.