Legal Opinion

Finfrock v. United States

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 20, 2012No. 11-3052PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. See Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 10); Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 11). The sole issue is whether Treasury Regulation 20.2032A-8(a)(2) (26 C.F.R. § 20.2032A-8(a)(2)) is a valid regulation. For the reasons that follow, this Court finds that the regulation is invalid. Because additional issues remain to be determined, however, the Motions for Summary Judgment are taken under advisement.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The parties have stipulated to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. LeFever v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Emergency Services Billing Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Centure Bank v. VogaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API