United States v. Miguel Angel Diaz-Boyzo
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
After a jury trial, Miguel Angel DiazBoyzo was convicted of distributing methamphetamine and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. On appeal, Diaz-Boyzo argues that the evidence against him was insufficient to support the convictions. After review and oral argument, we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Diaz-Boyzo was indicted in connection with an alleged conspiracy to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine involving Leonel Villa-Gamino, Eustolio Villa-Gamino, and Aurelio Ortiz-Zagada. According to the testimony at trial, the investigation into the conspiracy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Tiffany Sherrell Stanley, Charles Reynaldo CameronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Juan Phillip Leonard Scott Lee Moore, A.K.A. Dennis L. SpinksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Lopez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Robert EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Arturo HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Yugool PersaudCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Miguel Angel Diaz-Boyzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Atravius SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.