Legal Opinion

United States v. Miguel Angel Diaz-Boyzo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 14, 2005No. 04-15629PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

After a jury trial, Miguel Angel DiazBoyzo was convicted of distributing methamphetamine and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. On appeal, Diaz-Boyzo argues that the evidence against him was insufficient to support the convictions. After review and oral argument, we AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

Diaz-Boyzo was indicted in connection with an alleged conspiracy to distribute cocaine and methamphetamine involving Leonel Villa-Gamino, Eustolio Villa-Gamino, and Aurelio Ortiz-Zagada. According to the testimony at trial, the investigation into the conspiracy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Tiffany Sherrell Stanley, Charles Reynaldo CameronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Juan Phillip Leonard Scott Lee Moore, A.K.A. Dennis L. SpinksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Lopez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Arturo HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Yugool PersaudCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Miguel Angel Diaz-Boyzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Atravius SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API