Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ruzicka

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1922No. 22104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlansburg, J.

This was a suit in equity by the plaintiff, Miller, to foreclose a vendor’s lien on real estate in Holt county, which, by contract, he had agreed to convey for a consideration to defendants Ruzicka. Plaintiff claimed that he had tendered performance, but that defendants had failed and refused to perform. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff; held that the plaintiff was entitled to a vendor’s lien on the land; and allowed foreclosure. From this judgment the defendants appeal.

The contract entered into between plaintiff and defendants Ruzicka provided that the plaintiff should convey…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. MoffettMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Meyer, Bannerman & Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Neel v. ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
  4. Cordova Coal Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Irving v. BondNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Podewitz v. GERING NATIONAL BANKNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Department of Banking v. StengerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Miller v. RuzickaNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Rea v. PiersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Kummer v. KummerNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API