Smith v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
POLEN, Judge.
Brian Smith appeals his conviction for loitering and prowling. We reverse as the trial court erred by allowing the state to make repeated references to his failure to explain his presence and conduct to the police.
In State v. Ecker, 311 So.2d 104 (Fla.1975), the supreme court addressed the constitutionality of the loitering and prowling statute, section 856.021, and in doing so set out the elements of the offense as follows:
Under the provisions of this statute, the elements of the offense are: (1) the defendant loitered or prowled in a place, at a time, or in a manner not usual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- D.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Carroll v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roldan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Charton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- CHARLES ABEL v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Kavantzas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- R.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998