Legal Opinion
Roldan v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 18, 1997No. 97-1369PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
695 So.2d 864 (1997)
Michael E. ROLDAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-1369.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 18, 1997.
Michael E. Roldan, Moore Haven, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
2Per curiam
Appellant's rule 3.850 motion that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the amount of time he would serve in connection with his plea of guilty is legally insufficient, because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Richardson v. State, 677 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) and cases…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
4Cited by4 opinions
- Grogin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Poisal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Napier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998