I. J. Cooper Rubber Co. v. Johnson
Tennessee Supreme Court
E1ROM DAVIDSON Appeal from the' Chancery Conrt of Davidson Connty. — John Allison, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
This suit was instituted by the Cooper Rubber Company, an Ohio corporation, to recover of Johnson and Tinsley, as sureties on a bond executed by the Standard Vulcanizing & Tire Company (called the tire company in this opinion), as principal.
The tire company was engaged in handling automobile accessories in Nashville, and entered into a contract with the rubber company by the terms of which the latter agreed to consign to the former tires, etc.., for a designated period. On account of its lack of financial ability or standing, the tire company was required to execute a bond to save harmless…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Allen v. Tyson-Jones Buggy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
- Stein Double Cushion Tire Co. v. Wm. T. Fulton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Gunn v. White Sewing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of America, National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. LimaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1952
- City of Atlanta v. York Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Mitchell Wagon Co. v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Dansby v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Plibrico Jointless Firebrick Co. v. Waltham Bleachery & Dye WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.