Legal Opinion
Bucholz v. Green Bros.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 3, 1935PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of contract. After a trial in the Superior Court before a jury, where there was a verdict for the plaintiff, the case came here on exceptions. This court decided that there was a variance between the allegations of the declaration and the proof and made the following order: “The plaintiff is given leave, if so advised within thirty days after the date of the rescript, to file a *352motion in the Superior Court for appropriate amendments to his declaration so that it may conform to the proof; if such motion is filed and after hearing, preferably by the judge who presided at the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bucholz v. Green Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Menici v. Orton Crane & Shovel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Clark v. McNeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Wadsworth v. Boston Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Urban v. Central Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- EventMonitor, Inc. v. LenessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.