Legal Opinion
Otero v. Town of Southampton
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 28, 2002No. 9:99-cv-05919PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1870, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, et seq., for violations of the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments as well as various State laws. (Compl.^ 2, 20-30.)
Defendants Town of Southampton, Town of Southampton Police Department and Police Officer Andrew Mazzio (collectively the “Defendants”) move this Court for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons discussed herein, Defendants’ motion should be and the same is hereby granted.
BACKGROUND
I.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. GrinbergCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
- Watkins v. City of Highland ParkDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Durr v. SlatorDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Essani v. EarleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Francis v. Village of PotsdamDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.