Lizama v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ABRAHAM LIZAMA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:22 CV 1170 RWS ) H&M HENNES & MAURITZ LP, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Abraham Lizama purchased a sweater from defendant retailer H&M’s “conscious choice” collection. According to Lizama, he believed this meant his sweater was made using “more sustainable and environmentally friendly” manufacturing practices. According to Lizama, however, this product is not “environmentally friendly,” and he felt so misled by the representation that he now brings a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.