People v. Harris
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Fred H. Taft, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Upon an indictment charging him therewith, defendant was convicted of the crimes of burglary and grand larceny.
He appeals from the judgment which followed and from an order of court denying his motion for a new trial.
The accusation is based upon the alleged act of defendant in feloniously entering the banking-room of the First National Bank of Artesia and unlawfully taking therefrom certain moneys, bonds, and other personal property belonging to the bank.
[1] At his arraignment, on May 19, 1919, defendant entered a plea of not guilty and, with his consent, his trial was set for July 9th…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. FlannellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. ArceoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. SantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.