Hayden v. University of Notre Dame
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge
William and Letitia Hayden appeal from the trial court’s grant of the University of Notre Dame’s (Notre Dame) motion for summary judgment, presenting one issue for review:
Whether the trial court erred in concluding that Notre Dame did not owe a duty to Letitia Hayden to protect her from the criminal acts of a third party.
We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 16,1995, William and Letitia Hayden attended a football game on the Notre Dame campus. They were season ticket holders and sat in their assigned seats, which were in the south endzone behind the goalpost.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Delta Tau Delta, Beta Alpha Chapter v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Vernon v. Kroger Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Wickey v. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Brian Yost v. Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, Inc., Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity - Indiana Gamma Chapter at Wabash College, and Nathan CravensIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Brian Yost v. Wabash College, Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, Inc., Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity - Indiana Gamma Chapter at Wabash College, and Nathan CravensIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000