Legal Opinion
Emery & Kaufman, Ltd. v. Heyl
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 23, 1955No. 41390PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOISE, Justice.
The gravamen of this appeal presents the issue .of the dischargeability or nondischargeability of a debt in bankruptcy. The judge of the district court held that the debt, under the circumstances of record, was non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, and because of that decision this appeal is prosecuted.
*620The facts are as follows:
The General Agency of Emery & Kaufman, Ltd., party of the first part, and Add A. Heyl, party of the second part, the Local Agent, made an agreement relative to an Agency Contract, the first lines of that agreement reading:
“In consideration of the General .…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. HerbstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Upshur v. BriscoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- In Re BernardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HagertySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Middlesex Insurance Co. v. Koritz (In Re Koritz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- DL&B Oil Co. v. Dawson (In Re Dawson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Vagelos v. AbramsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Bergeron v. EvansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.