Legal Opinion
International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 12, 1959No. 18PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
This civil Sherman Act1 case was here four years ago on direct appeal from a dismissal by the District Court, which had held that the Act did not apply to the business of professional boxing. We reversed, finding that “the complaint states a cause of action [under the Act] and that the Government is entitled to an opportunity to prove its allegations,” and remanded the case for trial on the merits. United States v. International Boxing Club, 348 U. S. 236 (1955). The complaint charged the appellants with a combination and conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of trade and commerce among the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.