Pierce v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
In this collective action, sales employees for Wyndham allege that the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to compensate them for overtime. After a bench trial, the district court found that the employees were similarly situated and had presented sufficient representative evidence to show that Wyndham violated the Act. The court concluded that the 156 employees worked an average of 52 hours per week and awarded about $ 5 million in damages. The parties each appealed. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
I
Wyndham owns…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- O'BRIEN v. Ed Donnelly Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Brooke Clark v. A&L Homecare &Training Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Charles Ridgeway v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Andre Jackson, et al. v. Priority Waste LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Arends v. Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Arends v. Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.