Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Wilfred Welsh v. McNeil & Elliott

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2017No. 15-CV-524 & 15-CV-559 w stampPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Glickman, Associate Judge,

with whom Beckwith and McLeese, Associate Judges, join in parts I, II, and III.B, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

These appeals are from the resolution by summary judgment of a dispute between members of the Chaplin Woods Homeowners Association. Members Beverly McNeil and Alvin Elliott (the “McNeils”) rented their townhouse to a group of recovering alcoholics and substance abusers as a residence. The terms of the rental agreement did not meet certain requirements in the Homeowners Association’s Bylaws. Member Wilfred Welsh (‘Welsh”) sued the McNeils in…

2Cases cited80 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.