United States v. David Mendoza, Jr., Gerardo Garcia, Luis Pompilio Palacio, and Fabio Ramirez-Salazar
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellants raise numerous issues individually and jointly challenging their sentences and convictions under the federal laws prohibiting the possession and distribution of controlled substances. For the reasons that follow we affirm the judgments of conviction and sentences imposed by the district court. 1
I. BACKGROUND
Appellants were charged in a three count indictment. Count I charged David Mendoza, Jr., Gerardo Garcia, Luis Pompilio Pala-cio, Fabio Ramirez-Salazar, and David Arg-uelles with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and conspiracy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Narcisa SavinovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Conrad Whitehead, Ii, United States of America v. Hector QuesadaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- N. W. Enterprises, Inc. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. James Massa, United States of America v. Duane SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Reginald Sinclair BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Stanley J. Marshall, United States of America v. Richard L. Chapman, John M. Schoenecker, and Patrick BrummCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jeffrey H. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Michael R. Davis, United States of America v. William W. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.