Legal Opinion

United States v. James Massa, United States of America v. Duane Skinner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1984No. 83-1756, 83-1803PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

James Massa and Duane Skinner appeal their criminal convictions on a forty-three count indictment arising out of the massive swindle of the Stix & Company brokerage firm (Stix). The indictment charged Massa and Skinner with participation in a scheme masterminded by unindieted coconspirator Thomas Brimberry to loot the Stix firm. Brimberry, a one-time margin clerk for Stix, devised a plan for creating false internal records at Stix which allowed funds to be withdrawn from various accounts on the basis of nonexistent collateral. Count One of the indictment charged Massa,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. LuchtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API