Anderson v. Burgess

It is stated in respondents’ brief that the court concluded that the complaint did not state sufficient facts, and that the contract made between the parties was void because against public policy. Respondents have set out in their brief purported findings of fact and conclusions. From these, it appears that the Circuit Court considered the contract an attempt to dissolve the corporation without *269following the method prescribed by the statutes of the state, and a sale of all the property of the corporation contrary to the statutes.

The statutes having provided the method for dissolving…