Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Galloway

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In 1931 the plaintiff received from the Oregon Land and Livestock Company, of which he was a stockholder, the sum of $15,025. This was part of a larger sum and the total came in the form of a dividend. He did not include in his return under the Intangibles Income Tax Act (1931 Session Laws, p. 572, c. 335) to the State Tax Commission the aforementioned sum of $15,025. The commission was aware of all of the circumstances, and the omission was not prompted by a dishonest purpose. Later, the commission assessed a tax upon this sum and the issue presented by this appeal is whether it was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Lynch v. TurrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. McCarthy v. Coos Head Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Stipe v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Cobb v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API